 |
The Seventh Function of Language by Laurent Binet (2015) |
There must be fifteen people in the world (outside of French academia) who would be interested in this book. I hope I never have to meet them. Of course it’s a satire, a send-up, a burlesque… but it’s also very pretentious. In fact, beyond pretentious, beyond supercilious, beyond self-congratulatory. And do take note: this book is about French intellectuals and politicians, named and identified (if you can recognize them, their fame doesn’t really go past the borders of France) — and it’s set in 1980, so these are the intellectuals of yesteryear. These are the same French intellectuals who are contemptuous of Americans who don’t fully appreciate Jerry Lewis. Not to mention sneering at Americans who don’t know about structuralism post-structuralism, and a lot of other isms.
“How do you know that you’re not in a novel? How do you know you are not living inside a work of fiction? How do you know that you’re real?” one character asks another, shortly after a third character has been brutally mutilated by the self-appointed philosophical authorities. It’s that kind of book.
By the way: Yes, there are six other functions of language. The plot of this novel involves a madcap search for a missing piece of paper with a summary of “The Seventh Function of Language” which is the inscrutable final “function” in a semiotic analysis of a whole lot of abstract thoughts that appeal to the pretensions of one of these French school of philosophy. At the beginning, the actual death of Roland Barthes, one of these intellectuals, is revealed not to have been caused by a random auto accident (which actually happened) but by a complicated murder plot which draws in almost every other French intellectual in the field and numerous non-French ones too, including Umberto Eco and Noam Chomsky. As the novel proceeds, there are more and more violent deaths (odd for such an intellectual story)!
I feel as if this review has started circling the drain, maybe because the book goes on and on and on… Never mind.
Here are a few more quotes to show what I mean:
“Simon makes friends with a young Jewish feminist lesbian, coming out of Cixous’s conference on women’s writing. Her name is Judith, her family is from Hungary, she is doing a PhD in philosophy, and it so happens that she is interested in the performative function of language and suspects the patriarchal powers that be of resorting to some sneaky form of the performative in order to naturalize the cultural construction that is the model of the heteronormative monogamous couple: in plain English, according to Judith, all it takes is for the white heterosexual male to declare that something is in order for it to be.”
“Roland’s great semiological lesson that has stayed with me is pointing to any event in the universe and explaining that it signifies something. He always repeated that the semiologist, walking in the street, detects meaning where others see events.”
“In spite of his reputation, Foucault is pretty groggy after his exploits last night. He dips a huge pecan cookie in a remarkably drinkable double espresso. Slimane sits with him, eating a bacon cheeseburger with blue cheese. The restaurant is at the top of the hill, at the campus entrance [Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, site of an academic meeting with all the famous people], on the other side of the gorge spanned by a bridge where depressed students commit suicide from time to time. They are not really sure if they’re in a bar or a tearoom.”
Full disclosure: I bought the Kindle edition of this book, which had somehow been on my reading list, because it was only $2.99.
Review © 2025 mae sander